David is the only winner from Rutgers this year, and joins Professors Kristjan Haule, Emil Yuzbashyan, Alex Morozov, and Valery Kiryukhin to make five SloanRead more
A search of the worldwide web will turn up many, many more universities and research centers that have begun to offer Electronic Dissertations and ThesesRead more
Research papers on vigilantism
tricky thing that toes the line between heroism and crime, depending who you ask. . As one may point out, an individuals understanding of right and wrong is subjective, allowing certain people to empathize with one set of morals over another. The paper argues that vigilantism has six necessary features: (i) it involves planning and premeditation by those engaging in it; (it) its participants are private citizens whose engagement is voluntary; (iii) it is a form of autonomous citizenship and, as such, constitutes a social movement;. Works Cited: Cornell University Law School. Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives. How do we decide when one crime can fix another, and how do we decide whose pain is more important? This approach is distinct from attempts to define vigilantism as mere establishment violence and neither assumes vigilante engagement to be extra-legal nor to involve the necessary imposition of punishment on victims. Multiple factors play a role in determining whether or not vigilante justice is acceptable. Lack of perceived legitimacy may in turn not only make victims of violent crime who know their offender less willing to cooperate with the police, but also more supportive of vigilantism.
Research Proposal: Separating Vengeance from Vigilante Justice
(PDF) Public support for vigilantism: An experimental study
Indeed, many vigilantes have been counted throughout history, even heralded as heroes. Empathy, Justice, and the Law. I believe this can factor into the ones opinion on whether or not a certain instance of vigilantism is warranted. Generally, vigilante justice is only accepted under certain circumstances, but I would like to analyze the reason for this and identify the circumstances in which vigilante action is justifiable through the lens of empathy. On the one hand, he was a traitor for releasing his countrys secrets, but he also felt as if there was a moral obligation to tell the American people that their basic rights were being violated. Although previous studies on the relation- ship between perceived legitimacy and vigilantism are often focused on public support for the use of violence to settle disputes, they seem to concur with this line of reasoning (see Tankebe 2009, Haas. Accessed Nov 14, 2016. Another source I plan on using is David Fidlers The Snowden Reader, which details the events of Edward Snowdens decision to release information about the NSA spying on the American people and the subsequent reactions to his choice.